Engage!

Critical Dharma for Thinking Minds

Culadasa Charged with Sexual Misconduct

John Yates, aka Culadasa, author of The Mind Illuminated, has been confronted with charges of sexual misconduct by the Board of Dharma Treasure. The incidents involve adultery with several women, for whom he also allegedly provided financial support.

Dear Dharma Treasure Sangha,

It was recently brought to the attention of Dharma Treasure Board members that John Yates (Upasaka Culadasa) has engaged in ongoing conduct unbecoming of a Spiritual Director and Dharma teacher. He has not followed the upasaka (layperson) precepts of sexual harmlessness, right speech, and taking what is not freely given.

We thoroughly reviewed a substantial body of evidence, contemplated its significance, and sought confidential counsel from senior Western Dharma teachers, who urged transparency. We also sought legal advice and spoke with various non-profit consultants to draw on their expertise and objectivity in handling this matter. As a result of our process, the Board has voted to remove Mr. Yates from all positions with Dharma Treasure.

In a series of Board meetings as well as written correspondences with Mr. Yates, he admitted to being involved in a pattern of sexual misconduct in the form of adultery. There is no evidence that this adultery involved improper interactions with students or any form of unwanted sexual advances.  Rather, adultery with multiple  women, some of whom are sex workers, took place over the past four years. The outcome was extended relationships with a group of about ten women. Relationships with some continue to the present day.

He has provided significant financial support to some of these women, a portion of which was given without the prior knowledge or consent of his wife. Mr. Yates also said he engaged in false speech by responding to his wife’s questions with admissions, partial truths, and lies during these years.

After we brought this misconduct to the attention of Mr. Yates, he agreed to write a letter to the Sangha disclosing his behavior, which would give students informed consent to decide for themselves whether to continue studying with him. However, after weeks of negotiations, we were unable to come to an agreement about the content and degree of transparency of his letter.

At the end of this entire process, we are sadly forced to conclude that Mr. Yates should not be teaching Dharma at this time. Likewise, we are clear that keeping the upasaka (layperson) vows is an absolutely essential foundation for serving as the Spiritual Director of Dharma Treasure. With heavy hearts, the Board has voted to remove him from this role, from the Board, and from all other positions associated with Dharma Treasure.

We also acknowledge the benefit of Mr. Yates’ scholarship, meditation instructions, and the personal guidance he has provided for so many earnest seekers, including ourselves. People from all over the world have been deeply impacted by the Dharma he has presented, and we do not wish to minimize the good he has done. We are forever grateful for the study and practice we have all undertaken together with Mr. Yates.

We know people may feel disbelief and dismay upon learning about this pattern of behavior. However, it is our strong wish that we all use this time as an opportunity to practice patient inquiry, compassion, and discernment. Our goal in sharing this information with the Sangha is to provide each of you with enough information to make your own informed decision about whether or how to work with Mr. Yates as a teacher. We hope this transparency about Mr. Yates’ behavior can help us all move toward a place where we honor teachers for their gifts while acknowledging they are complex human beings who make mistakes.

You can imagine this has been a long, methodical, and distressing process. Moving forward, we feel it is in the best interest of the organization to form a new Board that brings fresh perspectives and energy. The current Board will resign after vetting and electing new qualified Board members to carry on the mission of Dharma Treasure.

Finally, we hope this disclosure about Mr. Yates’ conduct does not shake your confidence in the Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha. The transformative strength of refuge in the triple treasure can sustain us through this challenging time. Many other communities have walked this difficult path and emerged wiser and stronger. The ancient and modern history of Buddhism is filled with examples of the Dharma’s liberating individual and social power and compassion. Let us never forget that.

In service,
The Dharma Treasure Board of Directors
Blake Barton
Jeremy Graves
Matthew Immergut
Eve Smith
Nancy Yates

15 comments on “Culadasa Charged with Sexual Misconduct

  1. Emil
    2019/08/19

    This is libel. Helping prostitutes is not sexual misconduct.

    I mean… Of course I don’t now the exact details… But that’s true for everyone but Culadasa. And he hasn’t been given a chance to tell his side of the story.

    Anyhow. I think this should be put on pause…

    • Shaun Bartone
      2019/08/19

      It’s not libel, because what I published in this post were true facts. I said that Culadasa has been ‘confronted with charges of’ sexual misconduct by the Board of Dharma Treasure. That doesn’t mean it’s been proven to be true or that he’s therefore ‘guilty of sexual misconduct.

      • dougt
        2019/08/20

        “Charged” implies legal proceedings to most people. He was voted off the Board of the Dharma Treasure (DT) and his position of Spiritual Director because of sexual misconduct,

        To me this whole matter seems like it should have stayed between he and his wife, and not involved the DT board. The sexual improprieties did not involve his students nor did they involve his acting in any capacity as a Teacher or Spiritual Director of the Community.

        There is a difference between immoral acts and ethical violations.

        And the fact that his wife, who has a clear conflict of interest in the matter, was on the Board that voted him out and did not recuse herself from the proceedings is totally inappropriate and against the bylaws of the Dharma Treasure.

      • olvegg
        2019/09/04

        A charge refers to criminal law. Please correct your article to match reality. Mr Yates was not “charged”, he was investigated by the board of Dharma Treasure and subsequently removed as director.

      • Shaun Bartone
        2019/09/05

        charge /CHärj/ (verb) 2. accuse (someone) of something; 2a. make an accusation or assertion that.
        “opponents charged that below-cost pricing would reduce safety”

      • olvegg
        2019/09/05

        Thanks for your reply, with all due respect you either did not understand what I meant or did not choose to look any further at this point in time. I would assume the latter as someone else did comment something similar.

        A “criminal charge” is a criminal legal document that starts a case in court. Stating that Mr Yates was charged is not factual and could damage further individual reputations which I am sure was not your intention. Mr Yates was investigated within the Dharma Treasure organization and not under the law.

        While it is true that Mr Yates was found to have conducted himself inappropriately and subsequently removed from his teaching and leadership position, all of this happened within the Dharma Treasure organization.

        Thanks for correcting your article unless you believe that a charge is not a legal term.

      • Emil
        2019/09/14

        Ok. Got you in full. Metta

  2. Pingback: Calling It Quits – Dharma Nerds

  3. DougT
    2019/08/20

    “Charged” implies legal proceedings to most people. He was voted off the Board of the Dharma Treasure (DT) and his position of Spiritual Director because of sexual misconduct with people outside of his spiritual community.

    To me this whole matter seems like it should have stayed between him and his wife, and not involved the DT board. The sexual improprieties did not involve his students nor did they involve his acting in any capacity as a Teacher or Spiritual Director of the Community.

    There is a difference between immoral acts and ethical violations.

    And the fact that his wife, who has a clear conflict of interest in the matter, was on the Board that voted him out and did not recuse herself from the proceedings is totally inappropriate and against the bylaws of the Dharma Treasure.

    • Shaun Bartone
      2019/08/20

      “The sexual improprieties did not involve his students nor did they involve his acting in any capacity as a Teacher or Spiritual Director of the Community.”

      His sexual improprieties–which Culadasa admitted–most certainly do have an impact on his teaching and capacity to lead the organization–and thus they affect his students.

      It was Culadasa who said that ‘awakening’—stream entry to arhantship—which he defined as “traits, not states,” includes ethical behavior and keeping the precepts. In other words, awakening results not in exceptional states of consciousness, but long-lasting character traits that should include ethical behavior and keeping the precepts. The Suttas say many times that a true arhant will not break the precepts or vinaya vows.

      If Culadasa can’t keep the basic 5 Precepts, then he is contradicting his own teaching, and thus not fit to teach.

      • dougt
        2019/08/20

        Interesting take on it. Did you catch his Deconstructing Yourself podcast with Michael Taft where he “came out” as to meditation never having allowed access to deep psychological conditioning that was affecting his life?

        He said they only came to light and started getting cleared up when he tuned into his emotional system and started explicitly naming and expressing the feelings and feeling believe in there.

        He ended it with a very strong and controversial statement that Michael agreed with, that we have to change how we teach meditation and the Dharma (to more explicitly work with this kind of material).

  4. Sam
    2019/08/22

    Thank you for this post. I think the board made the right decision.

  5. Paige
    2019/09/07

    interesting responses to defend such behavior, then get into a mental or circular debates about a word. a bait a switch, to discredit those who had the sad task of cleaning up someone else’s mess. do you really want to study with someone who is not fully congruent in all aspects of their lives?

    • olvegg
      2019/09/10

      Paige, what is interesting to me if I am following this line of inquiry is how people who claim to adhere to right speech and right action (I believe we all are here adhering to the dharma to some extent) are not interested in speaking the truth.

      The truth is that a charge is a criminal law term and that it has implications on people’s lives including Mr Yates, his wife and his students. None of whom have asked others to go beyond the initial communication and interpret the truth.

      Mr Yates was not charged in the legal sense. This is just not true however you want to twist it in your mind. This is defamation however and as such, and by definition not right speech.

      Is it right to say that he was not charged, it is also right to say that the board made the right decision, including removing him from his teaching and leadership position as he broke the vows of an Upsaka and the bylaws and moral obligations of his organization.

      I was devastated to read the news, but my intention is not to defend Mr Yates, I am happy with the board’s decision and extend my compassion to all of us that have been affected by this situation.

      You can be fair to both the board and Mr Yates, the two are not mutually exclusive.

      With Metta.

  6. Pingback: Scandal, Ambivalence, Hypocrisy and Culture - Psych Reviews

Leave a Reply to Paige Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on 2019/08/19 by .

Archives

Follow Engage! on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 524 other followers

Blog Stats

  • 151,882 hits
%d bloggers like this: